Automated Hyperparameter Optimization of Lightweight YOLO11s for Efficient Road Crack Detection


Ida Ayu Ari Angreni(1*); Diyanti Diyanti(2); Vega Valentine(3);

(1) Gunadarma University
(2) Gunadarma University
(3) Gunadarma University
(*) Corresponding Author

  

Abstract


Automatic road crack detection plays an essential role in infrastructure maintenance, where rapid and accurate visual inspection is required under real-world conditions. Although deep learning–based detection models have demonstrated promising performance, many existing approaches rely on computationally intensive architectures or require manual hyperparameter tuning, which limits their efficiency and real-time applicability. Moreover, the integration of lightweight detection models with automated hyperparameter optimization remains relatively underexplored.This study proposes an efficient road crack detection framework based on a lightweight YOLO11s architecture enhanced through automated hyperparameter optimization using Optuna on the DeepCrack dataset. The proposed methodology includes image preprocessing through data augmentation, normalization, and resizing to improve model robustness. Subsequently, key hyperparameters including learning rate, weight decay, dropout rate, and optimizer selection are automatically optimized to obtain the best model configuration. Experimental results indicate that the optimized YOLO11s model achieves a precision of 90.4%, recall of 86.8%, mAP@0.5 of 89.8%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 63.6% after 25 optimization trials. These results demonstrate that automated hyperparameter optimization can significantly improve detection performance while maintaining computational efficiency. The main contribution of this study lies in the systematic integration of automated hyperparameter tuning within a lightweight YOLO-based framework, providing a resource efficient and accurate solution suitable for real-time and large-scale road damage monitoring


Keywords


Detection; Hyperparameter Tuning; Model; Road Crack; YOLO11s;

  
  

Full Text:

PDF
  

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 110 times
PDF view: 48 times
     

Digital Object Identifier

doi  https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v18i1.2894.138-150
  

Cite

References


X. Yang, J. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Jing, H. Zheng, and W. Xu, “Automation in road distress detection, diagnosis and treatment,” J. Road Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.01.005.

P. M. S. Raihan et al., “Pavement crack detection and solution with artificial intelligence,” Eur. J. Theor. Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 277–314, 2024, DOI: 10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(4).25.

L. Fan, S. Tang, M. K. A. M. Ariffin, M. I. S. Ismail, and X. Wang, “Impact of image preprocessing and crack type distribution on YOLOv8-based road crack detection,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/s25072180.

A. Paliotto, M. Meocci, A. Terrosi, and F. La Torre, “Systematic review, evaluation and comparison of different approaches for the implementation of road network safety analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 7, Art. no. e28391, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28391.

Q. Yuan, Y. Shi, and M. Li, “A review of computer vision-based crack detection methods in civil infrastructure: Progress and challenges,” Remote Sens., vol. 16, no. 16, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/rs16162910.

C. P. Ng, T. H. Law, F. M. Jakarni, and S. Kulanthayan, “Road infrastructure development and economic growth,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 512, no. 1, 2019, DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/512/1/012045.

T. Tamagusko, M. Gomes Correia, and A. Ferreira, “Machine learning applications in road pavement management: A review, challenges and future directions,” Infrastructures, vol. 9, no. 12, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures9120213.

G. Kim and S. Kim, “A road defect detection system using smartphones,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 7, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/s24072099.

A. Malekloo, X. C. Liu, and D. Sacharny, “AI-enabled airport runway pavement distress detection using dashcam imagery,” Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 2481–2499, 2024, DOI: 10.1111/mice.13200.

H. Wu, L. Kong, and D. Liu, “Crack detection on road surfaces based on improved YOLOv8,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 190850–190864, 2024, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3517632.

J. Zhang, Z. V. Beliaeva, and Y. Huang, “Accuracy–efficiency trade-off: Optimizing YOLOv8 for structural crack detection,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 13, Art. no. 3873, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/s25133873.

A. Saberironaghi and J. Ren, “DepthCrackNet: A deep learning model for automatic pavement crack detection,” J. Imaging, vol. 10, no. 5, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10050100.

M. F. Abdelkader et al., “EGY_PDD: A comprehensive multi-sensor benchmark dataset for accurate pavement distress detection and classification,” Multimed. Tools Appl., 2025, DOI: 10.1007/s11042-025-20700-w.

Y. Liu, J. Yao, X. Lu, R. Xie, and L. Li, “DeepCrack: A deep hierarchical feature learning architecture for crack segmentation,” Neurocomputing, vol. 338, pp. 139–153, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.036.

B. Padakanti, G. Swathi, C. Maddigatla, K. Morigadi, V. Malothu, and P. Sirigadde, “Road crack detection using deep learning,” Int. Res. J. Adv. Eng. Manag., vol. 3, no. 04, pp. 1050–1054, 2025, DOI: 10.47392/irjaem.2025.0171.

C. Shorten and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning,” J. Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, DOI: 10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0.

Z. Song, Y. Liu, L. Chen, and J. Wang, “A data-centric AI perspective on data quality and data preprocessing in machine learning,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 89, pp. 1–14, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.017.

X. Liu, G. Karagoz, and N. Meratnia, “Analyzing the impact of data augmentation on the explainability of deep learning-based medical image classification,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/make7010001.

S. Saponara and A. Elhanashi, “Impact of image resizing on deep learning detectors for training time and model performance,” Lect. Notes Electr. Eng., vol. 866, pp. 10–17, 2022, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95498-7_2.

J. A. Ilemobayo et al., “Hyperparameter tuning in machine learning: A comprehensive review,” J. Eng. Res. Rep., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 388–395, 2024, DOI: 10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i61188.

P. Sridevi, Z. Arefin, and S. I. Ahamed, “An integrated machine learning and hyperparameter optimization framework for noninvasive creatinine estimation using photoplethysmography signals,” Healthc. Anal., vol. 7, Art. no. 100395, 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.health.2025.100395.

N. Ma et al., “Vehicular road crack detection with deep learning: A new online benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of existing algorithms,”.

M. A. K. Raiaan et al., “A systematic review of hyperparameter optimization techniques in convolutional neural networks,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 11, Art. no. 100470, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100470.

M. Sipper, “High per parameter: A large-scale study of hyperparameter tuning for machine learning algorithms,” Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 9, 2022, DOI: 10.3390/a15090315.

C. Peng, “Comprehensive analysis of the impact of learning rate and dropout rate on the performance of convolutional neural networks on the CIFAR-10 dataset,” Appl. Comput. Eng., vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 183–192, 2024, DOI: 10.54254/2755-2721/102/20241161.

O. Harris and M. Andrews, “Effects and results of dropout layer in reducing overfitting with convolutional neural networks,” World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 836–853, 2024, DOI: 10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.2.0584.

W. Zhu, X. Han, K. Zhang, S. Lin, and J. Jin, “Application of YOLO11 model with spatial pyramid dilation convolution (SPD-Conv) and effective squeeze-excitation fusion in rail track defect detection,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/s25082371.

Z. Wang et al., “PC-YOLO11s: A lightweight and effective feature extraction method for small target image detection,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 2, 2025, DOI: 10.3390/s25020348.

M. Sohaib, M. Arif, and J. M. Kim, “Evaluating YOLO models for efficient crack detection in concrete structures using transfer learning,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 12, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/buildings14123928.

R. Khanam and M. Hussain, “YOLOv11: An overview of the key architectural enhancements,”.

J. Terven, D. M. Córdova-Esparza, and J. A. Romero-González, “A comprehensive review of YOLO architectures in computer vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAS,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1680–1716, 2023, DOI: 10.3390/make5040083.

M. L. Ali and Z. Zhang, “The YOLO framework: A comprehensive review of evolution, applications, and benchmarks in object detection,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 12, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/computers13120336.

L. He, Y. Zhou, L. Liu, and J. Ma, “Research and application of YOLOv11-based object segmentation in intelligent recognition at construction sites,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 12, 2024, DOI: 10.3390/buildings14123777.

N. Jegham, C. Y. Koh, M. Abdelatti, and A. Hendawi, “YOLO evolution: A comprehensive benchmark and architectural review of YOLOv12, YOLO11, and their previous versions.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ida Ayu Ari Angreni, Diyanti Diyanti, Vega Valentine

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.